Qualified Compliance Participation Shape

Validates qualified participation relationships in legal compliance according to gUFO patterns.


Validates safe harbor objects and their good-faith criteria.


Validates enacted statutes.


Technical Assistance Participation Shape

Validates participation of organizations in technical assistance programs.


Validates compositional structure of treaty frameworks.


Enhanced shape for international treaty frameworks with strength assessment.


Operation involving all 55 FBI field offices in coordinated enforcement effort.


Automated system for distributing evidence packages to appropriate jurisdictions based on user location and evidence strength.


Operation coordinated by Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS).


Coordination of child rescue operations across jurisdictions.


Validation shape for communication protocol instances.


Community Outreach Triggered Investigation

Investigation triggered by victim disclosure following community outreach presentation.


Large-scale operation monitoring sex offender compliance and registration requirements.


Coordination of multiple compliance visits across jurisdictions.


Coordinated arrests conducted as part of larger operation.


Coordinated charging decisions across multiple jurisdictions to ensure consistent prosecution approach.


Personnel responsible for coordinating multi-jurisdictional activities.


Validates coordination consistency in multi-jurisdictional operations.


gUFO business rule: Effective coordination should correlate with high success rates.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for coordination phases.


Coordination Phase Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Phase type consistency for coordination phases.


Enhanced validation shape for coordination roles with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates gUFO Role type consistency for coordination roles.


Coordination Structure Composition Shape

Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for coordination structures.


gUFO business rule: Critical intelligence requires high security and real-time sharing.


Law enforcement operation that crosses state or national borders.


Validation shape for cross border operation instances.


Evidence collected across multiple states in trafficking investigation.


Validates data quality for multi-jurisdictional operations.


Prosecution team distributed across multiple jurisdictions for handling massive caseloads.


Legal request to transfer suspect between jurisdictions.


Law enforcement agency with federal jurisdiction.


Legal authority under federal law and courts.


Interstate activity that triggers federal jurisdiction.


Validation shape for federal state cooperation instances.


Investigation specifically targeting hands-on sexual offenses against children.


gUFO business rule: Highly complex operations require enhanced coordination mechanisms.


Formal sharing of intelligence or evidence between jurisdictions.


Agreement governing sharing of sensitive information between agencies.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for information sharing.


Enhanced validation shape for information sharing instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Phase involving compilation and analysis of multi-jurisdictional evidence.


Phase involving initial contact and coordination between jurisdictions.


Validation shape for intelligence sharing instances.


Formal agreement between agencies for cooperation and resource sharing.


gUFO business rule: Agencies with high cooperation willingness should have substantial resource capacity.


Situation involving successful coordination between agencies.


Law enforcement agency from foreign jurisdiction.


Legal authority in foreign countries.


Harmonization of legal approaches across countries for consistent prosecution of global platform users.


Framework for coordinating prosecutions across multiple countries for global platform takedowns.


Coordination between law enforcement agencies across state lines.


Crossing state lines to avoid prosecution or arrest.


Criminal network operating across state boundaries for trafficking.


Criminal offense involving transportation of victim across state lines.


Transportation of minor victim across state lines.


Phase involving coordinated execution of multi-jurisdictional operations.


Investigation conducted jointly by multiple law enforcement agencies.


Legal authority and geographic area where an agency has enforcement power.


Validation shape for jurisdiction coordination instances.


Situation involving disputes over jurisdictional authority.


Transfer of investigative authority between state and federal agencies.


Phase involving determination of lead agency and jurisdictional authority.


Legal authorization that specifies jurisdictional authority.


Operation involving 100+ law enforcement actions or extensive coordination.


gUFO business rule: Large-scale resource sharing requires high availability and cost effectiveness.


Government organization responsible for law enforcement within a jurisdiction.


Enhanced validation shape for law enforcement agency instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Primary agency responsible for coordinating multi-jurisdictional investigation.


Validation shape for legal coordination instances.


Officer responsible for communication between agencies.


Law enforcement agency with local jurisdiction (city, county, municipal).


Legal authority at local level (city, county, municipal).


Large-scale operation resulting in rescue of 100+ children.


Coordination of prosecutions for massive user bases from large-scale platform takedowns requiring simultaneous action across multiple jurisdictions (nearly 2 million users for Kidflix operation).


Mapping of massive user bases to appropriate jurisdictions for prosecution based on location and legal frameworks.


Multi-Agency Operation Composition Shape

Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for multi-agency operations.


Multi-Jurisdictional Cross Reference Shape

Validates cross-references between multi-jurisdictional operations and related entities.


Enhanced data quality validation for multi-jurisdictional operations with gUFO quality aspects.


Multi-Jurisdictional Event Temporal Shape

Validates gUFO temporal constraints for multi-jurisdictional events.


Multi-Jurisdictional Event Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Event type consistency for multi-jurisdictional investigations.


Investigation spanning multiple legal jurisdictions requiring coordination between agencies.


Enhanced validation shape for multi-jurisdictional operation instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for multi-jurisdictional investigations.


Complex situation requiring coordination across multiple jurisdictions.


Child sex trafficking investigation spanning multiple states.


Formal request for assistance from another jurisdiction.


Formally named multi-phase operation coordinated across jurisdictions.


Operation coordinated across multiple ICAC task forces nationally.


Coordination of child rescue operations across entire country.


Law enforcement operation coordinated across entire country involving all FBI field offices.


Comprehensive tracking of operation outcomes and effectiveness.


Type of national operation coordinated across 61+ ICAC Task Forces.


Organization Object Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Object type consistency for law enforcement organizations.


Agency providing support or resources to multi-jurisdictional investigation.


Validation shape for personnel sharing instances.


High-priority prosecution track for most serious offenders identified in mass user analysis.


Campaign focused on proactive investigation rather than reactive response.


Operation conducted under Project Safe Childhood initiative framework.


Analysis of prosecution capacity across jurisdictions to optimize case distribution for massive operations.


Qualified Coordination Participation Shape

Validates gUFO qualified participation situations in multi-jurisdictional coordination.


Coordination enabling rapid response from victim disclosure to arrest.


Violation of sex offender registration requirements.


Sharing of personnel, equipment, or expertise between agencies.


Enhanced validation shape for resource sharing instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates resource sharing arrangements.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for coordination roles.


Workflow from school safety presentation to victim disclosure to rapid arrest.


Individual compliance check visit to registered sex offender.


Validates information sharing date consistency.


Rescue of multiple children across different locations simultaneously.


Validates gUFO Situation type consistency for coordination situations.


Law enforcement agency with state-level jurisdiction.


Legal authority under state law and courts.


Documented crossing of state boundaries during offense.


Statewide operation conducting compliance checks across all jurisdictions.


Temporary multi-agency organization formed for specific operations.


Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for task force composition.


Officer responsible for leading multi-agency task force operations.


Coordinated operation conducted by multi-agency task force.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for task forces.


gUFO business rule: Task forces with advanced expertise should have high operational readiness.


Enhanced validation shape for task force instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates temporal consistency in multi-jurisdictional operations.


Center coordinating multi-state trafficking investigations.


Specific investigation task in multi-state trafficking case.


Transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.


Participation of US Attorney's Offices around the country in coordinated operation.


Prosecution strategy based on automated triage of user risk levels and evidence strength for massive user databases.


Task focused on identifying new child victims.


Number of agencies participating in the investigation.


Whether operation includes federal, state, and local agencies (true/false).


Number of agencies participating in operation (e.g., 31 agencies in Operation Hive Strike).


Number of individual agents deployed in operation (e.g., 80+ agents in Operation Hive Strike).


Total number of arrests made across all participating jurisdictions.


Legal authorization enabling multi-jurisdictional operation.


Number of cases submitted for prosecution.


Number of different charge types resulting from operation.


Number of children rescued from ongoing abuse.


Total number of children rescued during operation.


Barriers to effective inter-agency communication.


Established protocol for inter-agency communication.


Effectiveness rating of community outreach in generating disclosures (0.0-1.0).


Number of registration compliance violations discovered.


Number of compliance visits conducted during operation.


Links investigation to coordinating agent or officer.


Links coordination mechanism to participating agencies.


Operation coordinates individual compliance checks.


Links agency to nationwide coordination role.


Location of operation coordination center.


Challenges encountered in multi-jurisdictional coordination.


Complexity level of interstate coordination (simple, moderate, complex, highly_complex).


Method used for inter-agency coordination (task_force, liaison, joint_operation, mou).


Duration of coordination phase.


How costs are shared between agencies.


Number of counties involved in statewide operation (e.g., 5 counties in Operation Hive Strike).


Links statewide operation to state jurisdiction covered.


Communication methods used for cross-state coordination.


Whether investigation crosses state or national borders.


Type of documentation evidencing state line crossing (gps, toll_records, surveillance, witness).


Links agent deployment coordination to individual agents or agent groups.


State where transportation terminated.


Whether diplomatic channels were required for cooperation.


Time in hours from victim disclosure to suspect arrest.


Links coordination mechanism to rapid response capability.


Links interstate investigation to coordination mechanism used.


Operation facilitates child rescue coordination.


Number of FBI field offices participating in operation.


Interagency agreement governing the cooperation.


Number of cases accepted for grand jury indictment.


Type of jurisdictional handoff (state_to_federal, federal_to_state, state_to_state).


Number of arrests for hands-on offenses.


Temporal begin point for coordination phase.


Temporal end point for coordination phase.


Temporal begin point for coordination role.


Temporal end point for coordination role.


Links operation to hosting task force or agency.


Campaign includes victim identification tasks.


Level of information sharing between agencies (full, limited, restricted).


Geographic or jurisdictional scope of investigation (local, state, national, international).


Number of new investigations initiated during campaign.


Links investigation to participating law enforcement agency.


Links operation to participating FBI field office.


Links transportation offense to state line crossing events.


Operation involves multi-state trafficking investigation.


Number of jurisdictions involved in the investigation.


Type of federal jurisdiction trigger (interstate_transport, wire_communication, federal_property).


Conflicts between jurisdictional authorities or procedures.


Language barriers encountered in international cooperation.


Identifies the lead agency for the investigation.


Assessment of legal complexity (low, medium, high, extreme).


How often coordination meetings are held (daily, weekly, monthly, as_needed).


Number of agencies participating in task force.


Number of new child victims identified.


Links agency to the jurisdiction where it has authority.


Duration of operation in days.


Duration of operation in days (e.g., 4 days for Operation Hive Strike).


Official name of the multi-jurisdictional operation.


Current phase of the operation (planning, execution, follow-up).


Success rating of operation (most_successful, highly_successful, successful, limited).


State where transportation originated.


Number of personnel assigned to task force.


Primary legal jurisdiction for the investigation.


Behavior indicating attempt to avoid prosecution through flight.


Links agency providing assistance to requesting agency.


Links agency requesting assistance to providing agency.


Links interstate offense to required jurisdictional handoff.


Links operation to child rescue activities.


Type of resource being shared (personnel, equipment, expertise, funding).


Monetary value of shared resources in USD.


Number of search warrants executed during operation.


Links agency to another agency with which it shares information.


Links agency to another agency with which it shares resources.


Duration of resource sharing arrangement (in days).


Links multi-county operation to specific counties involved.


Number of specialized units deployed in operation.


Number of state boundaries crossed during transportation.


Number of states involved in trafficking investigation.


Whether operation covers entire state (true) or limited geographic area (false).


Metrics used to measure success of multi-jurisdictional cooperation.


Strategy for targeting multiple offender types (simultaneous, sequential, integrated).


Number of different offender types targeted simultaneously (e.g., 2 for predators and distributors).


Links multi-jurisdictional operation to specific offender types targeted.


Expected duration of task force operation (in months).


Type of task force (permanent, temporary, ad_hoc, specialized).


Number of ICAC task forces participating in operation.


Challenges posed by different time zones in coordination.


Total number of arrests made during operation.


Number of trafficking cases identified.


Intent for transportation (sexual_activity, sexual_conduct, avoiding_prosecution).


Method of transportation (vehicle, bus, train, plane, other).


International treaty or agreement enabling cooperation.


Links investigation to community outreach that triggered it.


Links transportation offense to federal jurisdiction trigger.


Investigation uncovers evidence across multiple states.


Number of US Attorney's Offices participating in operation.


Number of users targeted for prosecution in millions.


Links named operation to coordination mechanisms used.


Cooperation in developing AI-based solutions for detection, analysis, and prevention of child exploitation. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Academic institution participating in partnership with research and training capabilities. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Partnership with academic institutions for research, training, and technology development in child protection. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Phase of active cooperation with joint operations and information sharing. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Framework for engaging civil society, volunteers, and public participation in child protection initiatives. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Civil society organization participating in partnership with community engagement capabilities. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Complex situation involving multiple partners working together on investigations. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


Analysis performed by volunteer researchers and civil society organizations using open source intelligence methods. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Cooperation in developing and improving automated content detection systems. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Mechanism for coordinating activities and sharing information between partners. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Investigation leveraging public participation for object identification, geolocation, and evidence analysis. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Legal agreement governing data sharing between partners, including scope, limitations, and privacy protections. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Rapid coordination mechanism for urgent situations requiring immediate partner response. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Phase of partnership evaluation and effectiveness assessment. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Request for public assistance in identifying geographic locations from visual evidence. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Protocol for sharing cryptographic hashes of illegal content between partners for detection and prevention. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Framework governing how information is shared between public and private partners while protecting privacy and investigation integrity. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Situation involving active information sharing between partnership entities. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


Sharing of actionable intelligence between partners while maintaining operational security. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Operation conducted jointly by multiple partners with shared resources and coordination. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Law enforcement agency participating in partnership with investigative and enforcement responsibilities. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Initiative involving multiple types of organizations including law enforcement, technology companies, NGOs, and civil society groups. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Coordination framework with non-governmental organizations specializing in child protection and victim advocacy. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Non-governmental organization participating in partnership with advocacy and support capabilities. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Open source intelligence investigation conducted by skilled volunteers and researchers. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Request for public assistance in identifying objects, locations, or other evidence from case materials. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Role played by an organization within a public-private partnership framework. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Phase of partnership formation including agreement negotiation and framework establishment. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Cooperative monitoring of platforms and services for illegal content and activities. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Formal partnership between government/law enforcement agencies and private sector organizations for child protection initiatives. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Information provided by members of the public in response to crowdsourcing requests. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Regular meetings between partners for coordination, information sharing, and strategic planning. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Phase of partnership renewal or renegotiation. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Coordination through multi-partner task forces with representatives from different organizations. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Cooperation framework between law enforcement and technology companies for content detection, platform monitoring, and data sharing. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Technical integration between partner systems for automated information sharing and analysis. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Cooperation in developing and deploying technology solutions for child protection. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Technology company or provider participating in partnership with technical capabilities and platform access. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Joint development of investigative tools and technologies for law enforcement use. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Links civil society partners to community analysis they perform.


Links partners to technology cooperation initiatives.


Duration of cooperation event.


Links partnership activities to coordinating organization.


Links partnership activities to coordination mechanisms used.


Links technical integration to types of information sharing enabled.


Links investigation to identification requests generated.


Links partnership to information sharing frameworks governing it.


Temporal begin point for cooperation event.


Temporal end point for cooperation event.


Temporal begin point for partnership.


Temporal end point for partnership.


Temporal begin point for partnership phase.


Temporal end point for partnership phase.


Links partner organization to their role in the partnership.


Temporal begin point for partner role.


Temporal end point for partner role.


Links partnership to participating organizations.


Links technology partners to development projects they participate in.


Links partners to joint operations they participate in.


Duration of partnership from formation to termination.


Duration of partnership phase.


Links technology partners to platform monitoring they provide.


Links partners to emergency coordination they participate in.


Duration of partner role.


Links partners to intelligence sharing arrangements.


Links organization to crowdsourcing investigations they conduct.


Validation shape for community analysis instances.


Validation shape for content detection cooperation instances.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for cooperation events.


Validates gUFO Event type consistency for cooperation events.


Validation shape for coordination mechanism instances.


Advanced gUFO business rule: High engagement effectiveness requires high participation and response quality.


Validates crowdsourcing effectiveness metrics.


Enhanced validation shape for crowdsourcing investigation instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates data quality for partnership instances.


Validation shape for data sharing agreement instances.


Validation shape for emergency coordination instances.


Validation shape for geolocation request instances.


Validation shape for hash sharing protocol instances.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Highly effective partnerships should have high trust and coordination levels.


Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for information sharing composition.


Enhanced validation shape for information sharing framework instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Advanced gUFO business rule: High data quality requires enhanced security levels.


Validation shape for joint operation instances.


Validation shape for law enforcement partner instances.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Multi-stakeholder initiatives with many partners need comprehensive coordination.


Validation shape for multi-stakeholder initiative instances.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for multi-stakeholder initiatives.


Validation shape for NGO partner instances.


Validates data quality for national initiative program instances.


Validation shape for national initiative program instances.


Validation shape for object identification request instances.


Advanced gUFO business rule: High role effectiveness requires advanced capabilities and high commitment.


Enhanced validation shape for partner role instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for partner roles.


Validates gUFO Role type consistency for partner roles.


Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for partnership composition.


Validates consistency between partnership characteristics and participating organizations.


Enhanced data quality validation for partnerships with gUFO quality consistency rules.


Partnership Object Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Object type consistency for partnership objects.


Partnership Organization Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Organization type consistency for partnerships.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for partnerships.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for partnership phases.


Validates gUFO Phase type consistency for partnership phases.


Partnership Situation Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Situation type consistency for partnership situations.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for partnerships.


Validation shape for platform monitoring instances.


Validation shape for Project Safe Childhood case instances.


Enhanced validation shape for public-private partnership instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Qualified Partnership Participation Shape

Validates gUFO qualified participation situations in partnerships.


Validation shape for regular meeting instances.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for technology cooperation.


Validates that tech industry cooperation includes at least one technology partner.


Validation shape for tech industry cooperation instances.


Validation shape for technical integration instances.


Technology Cooperation Composition Shape

Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for technology cooperation composition.


Enhanced validation shape for technology cooperation instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Mature technology should have fast implementation and high reliability.


Validation shape for technology partner instances.


Validation shape for tool development instances.


Physical items intended for use in facilitating child abuse or exploitation (gUFO Object).


Body camera footage from law enforcement officers. Used for suspect identification and evidence. IS a digital observable as it is a digital recording.


Search of cellphone or mobile device for evidence. Typically requires consent or warrant (gUFO Event).


Situation where the chain of custody for evidence has been breached (gUFO Situation).


Items specifically designed to appeal to or attract children (gUFO Object).


Devices used to communicate with victims or distribute illegal content (gUFO FunctionalComplex).


Digital devices including computers, laptops, tablets, and mobile phones seized as evidence (gUFO FunctionalComplex).


Contraceptive devices found as evidence corroborating intent to engage in sexual activity. Extends AbuseFacilitationItem as physical evidence (NOT a digital observable).


Authorization obtained through suspect's consent to search property or devices. Extends investigation:Authorization for CASE ontology integration.


Action of acquiring items specifically for criminal purposes (gUFO Event).


Dashboard camera footage from police vehicles. Digital observable.


Consent authorization specific to electronic device search (cellphone, computer, etc.).


Items used to conceal identity or change appearance (gUFO Object).


Physical documents, printed materials, or written items relevant to the investigation (gUFO Object).


Phase during which physical evidence is undergoing forensic analysis (gUFO Phase - anti-rigid).


Action of collecting and documenting physical evidence during search. Extends investigation:InvestigativeAction (gUFO Event).


Phase during which physical evidence is being collected (gUFO Phase - anti-rigid).


Situation where physical evidence has been contaminated or compromised (gUFO Situation).


Role of person responsible for evidence custody and chain of custody (gUFO Role - anti-rigid).


Phase during which evidence disposition is determined and executed (gUFO Phase - anti-rigid).


Situation involving the recovery of previously lost or missing evidence (gUFO Situation).


Legal seizure of physical items as evidence. Extends investigation:InvestigativeAction (gUFO Event).


Phase during which physical evidence is in secure storage (gUFO Phase - anti-rigid).


Role of person conducting forensic analysis of physical evidence (gUFO Role - anti-rigid).


Search of vehicle glove compartment as specific evidence location (gUFO Event).


Alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances intended to impair victim judgment. Extends AbuseFacilitationItem.


Alteration or customization of items to facilitate criminal activity (gUFO Event).


Purchase of items through online platforms for criminal purposes (gUFO Event).


Personal belongings that may contain evidence or indicate criminal behavior (gUFO Object).


Tangible items collected as evidence in ICAC investigations (gUFO Object).


Provenance record tracking chain of custody and handling of physical evidence. Extends investigation:ProvenanceRecord for CASE ontology integration.


In-person purchase of items for criminal purposes (gUFO Event).


Law enforcement search of physical premises for evidence. Extends investigation:InvestigativeAction for CASE ontology integration (gUFO Event).


Devices used to create audio or video recordings of criminal activity (gUFO FunctionalComplex).


Search of residential premises including homes and apartments (gUFO Event).


Items intended for restraining or controlling victims (gUFO Object).


Role of law enforcement officer conducting physical searches (gUFO Role - anti-rigid).


External storage devices including hard drives, USB drives, memory cards, and optical media (gUFO Object).


Recording from surveillance or security cameras. Digital observable.


Vehicle registered to or used by suspect in ICAC offense. Used for evidence tracking when suspect travels to meet alleged minor. Physical evidence item.


Electronic vaporizer or e-cigarette found as evidence. Often brought to lure or facilitate abuse of minors. Extends AbuseFacilitationItem as physical evidence (NOT a digital observable).


Consent authorization specific to vehicle search.


Search of motor vehicles for evidence or contraband. May be conducted with consent or warrant (gUFO Event).


Search of workplace or commercial premises (gUFO Event).


Whether suspect agreed to bring this item during undercover communication.


Links vehicle to the location it arrived at for meeting.


Links evidence to the person associated with its ownership or use.


Documentation of evidence handling from seizure to court.


Links evidence to the collection action.


Brand of the condoms (e.g., 'Durex').


Number of condoms found.


Whether consent was given for the search.


Scope of consent given (vehicle_only, device_only, full_search).


Type of consent obtained (verbal, written, implied).


Whether consent was subsequently withdrawn.


Indicates that one evidence item was found inside another (gUFO part-whole relationship).


Intended criminal use of the item.


Manufacturer or brand of the computer equipment.


Model number or name of the device.


Whether illegal digital content was found on the device.


Whether the device or storage media is encrypted (encrypted, unencrypted, partially_encrypted).


Links physical evidence to the vehicle it was found in.


Unique identifier assigned to evidence item during collection.


Category of physical evidence (digital_device, document, contraband, personal_item).


Assessment of evidence importance (critical, high, medium, low).


Whether the item requires specialized forensic analysis.


Specific location where evidence was found (e.g., 'glove compartment').


Whether the device is functional (working, non_functional, partially_functional).


Risk assessment of criminal acquisition patterns (gUFO quality aspect).


Accuracy level of forensic analysis (gUFO quality aspect).


Reliability of forensic analysis results (gUFO quality aspect).


Links search action to consent authorization. Uses investigation:relevantAuthorization pattern.


Level of evidence contamination (gUFO quality aspect).


Integrity level of chain of custody (gUFO quality aspect).


Completeness of custody documentation (gUFO quality aspect).


Temporal begin point for evidence lifecycle (gUFO temporal property).


Temporal end point for evidence lifecycle (gUFO temporal property).


Overall integrity level of physical evidence (gUFO quality aspect).


Reliability assessment of evidence for prosecution (gUFO quality aspect).


Forensic value assessment of evidence (gUFO quality aspect).


Validation status of analysis methods used (gUFO quality aspect).


Temporal begin point for evidence phases (gUFO temporal property).


Temporal end point for evidence phases (gUFO temporal property).


Quality level of evidence preservation (gUFO quality aspect).


Temporal begin point for procurement events (gUFO temporal property).


Temporal end point for procurement events (gUFO temporal property).


Suspicion level regarding criminal procurement (gUFO quality aspect).


Links physical evidence to its provenance record for chain of custody tracking.


Temporal begin point for forensic roles (gUFO temporal property).


Temporal end point for forensic roles (gUFO temporal property).


Temporal begin point for search events (gUFO temporal property).


Completeness assessment of search coverage (gUFO quality aspect).


Efficiency rating of search operation (gUFO quality aspect).


Temporal end point for search events (gUFO temporal property).


Thoroughness level of physical search (gUFO quality aspect).


Traceability level of procurement source (gUFO quality aspect).


Whether the item contains hidden compartments or concealed areas.


Links bodycam footage to the traffic stop during which it was recorded.


Whether the bodycam footage was matched to selfies sent by suspect (as in Miami ICAC case).


Purpose of item modification for criminal activity.


Method of payment used (credit_card, cash, digital_currency, check).


Physical state of the evidence (excellent, good, fair, poor, damaged).


Links a physical evidence item to its procurement action.


Cost paid for the item in USD.


Date when the item was acquired by the suspect.


Method used to acquire the item (online_purchase, retail_store, private_sale, gift).


Source from which the item was acquired (vendor name, website, individual).


Date and time when the recording was made.


Duration of the recording in seconds.


Officer whose bodycam made the recording.


Whether the vehicle is registered to the suspect.


Duration of the search in hours.


Areas or items covered by the search authorization.


Warrant authorizing the search and seizure.


Law enforcement officer who conducted the search.


Links physical evidence to the search operation during which it was seized.


Date when the evidence was seized by law enforcement.


Physical location where evidence was seized.


Serial number of the device or item.


Storage capacity of digital storage media in gigabytes.


Signs that the item has been tampered with or modified.


Age group of children the item is designed to attract.


Whether the recording was used to identify suspects.


Whether the vehicle was used in the commission of the offense.


Brand of the vape device.


Flavor of the vape device (e.g., 'strawberry').


Exterior color of the vehicle (e.g., 'white').


License plate number of the vehicle.


Manufacturer of the vehicle (e.g., 'Toyota').


Model of the vehicle (e.g., 'Corolla').


Vehicle Identification Number.


Model year of the vehicle (e.g., 2015).


Civilian witness present during the search.


Validation shape for bodycam footage evidence.


Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for computer equipment composition.


Enhanced validation shape for computer equipment instances.


Validation shape for condoms found as evidence.


Validation shape for consent-based search authorizations.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Low contamination requires excellent preservation and handling.


Enhanced validation shape for criminal procurement instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates evidence custody integrity.


Validation shape for device consent search authorizations.


Validates gUFO part-whole relationships for evidence composition.


Validates cross-references between evidence and related entities.


Enhanced validation shape for evidence custodian role instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Enhanced data quality validation for physical evidence with gUFO quality consistency rules.


Validates temporal sequence consistency in evidence lifecycle.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for physical evidence.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for evidence phases.


Validates gUFO Phase type consistency for evidence phases.


Evidence Situation Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Situation type consistency for evidence situations.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for physical evidence.


Enhanced validation shape for forensic analyst role instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for forensic roles.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for forensic roles.


Validates gUFO Role type consistency for forensic roles.


Advanced gUFO business rule: High forensic value evidence should have excellent integrity and preservation.


Physical Evidence Object Type Validation Shape

Validates gUFO Object type consistency for physical evidence.


Enhanced validation shape for physical evidence instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Enhanced validation shape for physical search instances with gUFO quality aspects.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for procurement events.


Validates gUFO Event type consistency for procurement events.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Highly reliable analysis requires validated methods and high accuracy.


Validates gUFO temporal constraints for search events.


Validates search event timing consistency.


Validates gUFO Event type consistency for search events.


Validates gUFO participation constraints for search events.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Pristine custody integrity requires complete documentation.


Validation shape for suspect vehicles used in ICAC offenses.


Advanced gUFO business rule: High suspicion procurement should have enhanced traceability requirements.


Advanced gUFO business rule: Comprehensive searches should have high efficiency and completeness.


Validation shape for vape devices found as evidence.


Validation shape for vehicle consent search authorizations.


Account-level metadata including creation date, profile information, and activity patterns.


An action to suspend or terminate a user account due to policy violations. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for account suspension action instances.


Level of anonymity protection provided by platform features and policies.


Platform that allows anonymous or minimally verified communication, enabling contact without identity verification.


Opportunities provided by platform for anonymous users to initiate contact with other users.


An action by a platform to generate hashes of content for detection and matching. Modeled as gUFO Event.


An action taken by a platform to moderate content (review, remove, restrict, etc.). Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for content moderation action instances.


The ability and methods a platform uses to detect, review, and remove inappropriate content. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for content moderation capability instances.


Content Moderation Cross Reference Shape

Validates that content platforms have moderation capabilities.


A queue/backlog of content items awaiting moderation review and operational handling at scale (e.g., large volumes of flagged CSAM candidates).


Validates moderation queue objects used for scaled content review operations.


Evidence found across multiple social media platforms by the same user.


A service for cryptocurrency transactions and exchanges (e.g., Bitcoin, Coinbase, Binance). Modeled as gUFO Object.


A service accessible through anonymizing networks like Tor, often used for illegal activities. Modeled as gUFO Object.


An action to preserve user data in response to legal requests. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for data preservation action instances.


Validates data quality for platform entities.


Validates that service providers have data retention policies.


A platform's policy for how long they retain user data and content. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for data retention policy instances.


Correlation between evidence found on devices and social media accounts.


Process of correlating evidence found across devices and platforms.


Digital evidence found on electronic devices including computers, phones, and storage media.


An organization that provides digital services and platforms, with responsibilities for content moderation and law enforcement cooperation. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Validation shape for electronic service provider instances.


Time-sensitive request by law enforcement/investigators to an electronic service provider for immediate disclosure of information based on an asserted emergency involving imminent danger (e.g., danger of death or serious physical injury). Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for emergency disclosure request instances (EDR).


A service for storing and sharing files online (e.g., Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, MEGA). Modeled as gUFO Object.


A digital platform for gaming with communication features (e.g., Xbox Live, PlayStation Network, Steam, Roblox, Minecraft). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for game platform instances.


Platform feature allowing users to chat without creating accounts or verifying identity.


Platform policy regarding when and how user identities may be disclosed to other users or authorities.


Coordinated takedown of major exploitation platforms with user bases exceeding 1 million accounts, requiring specialized international coordination and mass forensic processing. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for large scale platform takedown instances.


A platform's ability to respond to legal requests and cooperate with law enforcement. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validates legal compliance capabilities for service providers.


An action to disclose user data to law enforcement in response to legal process. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for legal data disclosure action instances.


Analysis of user behavior patterns across massive user bases for investigation prioritization and automated threat assessment. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for mass user behavior analysis instances.


User database analysis for platforms with massive user bases requiring specialized processing techniques and automated analysis tools. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for mass user database instances.


Situation involving platforms with massive user bases requiring specialized investigation approaches. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


A digital service for real-time communication and messaging (e.g., WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Discord, Kik). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for messaging service instances.


Verification requirements that are easily bypassed or minimal (email only, no identity check).


Operational metrics describing moderation throughput and latency (e.g., queue size, review latency, flagged volume).


Validates moderation throughput/latency metrics used to quantify bottlenecks.


Situation involving coordination across multiple platforms and service providers. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


A platform for meeting and dating online (e.g., Tinder, Bumble, Grindr, dating websites). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Chat rooms open to anonymous users without verification or moderation.


Situation involving cooperative efforts between platforms and law enforcement. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


Phase when platform is deployed and becomes operational. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Phase of platform expansion and user base growth. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Coordinated investigation across multiple platforms and devices.


Phase when platform is under law enforcement investigation. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Phase of active content moderation and policy enforcement. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Coordinated law enforcement operation targeting specific platforms or services. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validates that platforms have associated operators.


Phase of platform takedown and shutdown operations. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Private messages or direct communications on social media platforms.


Ability to browse and contact user profiles anonymously without revealing identity.


Platform feature that randomly matches users for anonymous conversations.


Validates logical consistency of retention periods.


Situation in which moderation review demand exceeds capacity, producing review backlog/latency risks.


Coordinated search warrant execution on devices and platform accounts.


User account on a social media platform potentially containing evidence.


Application data from social media apps stored on devices.


Digital evidence collected from social media platforms, including posts, messages, and account information.


A digital platform for social networking and content sharing (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, LinkedIn). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for social media platform instances.


Individual posts, updates, or content shared on social media platforms.


Social media content downloaded and stored on electronic devices.


Organizations providing technical infrastructure (hosting, CDN, DNS, etc.) that may be involved in content distribution. Modeled as gUFO Organization.


Validates temporal consistency for platform actions.


System allowing creation of temporary accounts with minimal verification requirements.


Automated classification of user risk levels based on platform activity patterns, content sharing, and behavioral indicators. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for user risk classification instances.


Classification system for platform size based on user base: small (<1K), medium (1K-100K), large (100K-1M), massive (1M+). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for user scale classification instances.


Systems used by platforms to verify user identity and age. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for user verification system instances.


A platform for video content streaming and sharing (e.g., YouTube, Twitch, OnlyFans, Periscope). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for video streaming platform instances.


Whether the platform accepts and responds to legal process requests.


Status of account (active, suspended, deleted, preserved).


Username or handle for social media account.


Duration of platform action.


The method used for age verification (e.g., 'self-declaration', 'ID verification', 'credit card', 'none').


Whether age verification is required for anonymous features.


Whether platform allows anonymous chat without account creation.


Level of anonymity provided (full_anonymous, pseudo_anonymous, semi_verified, fully_verified).


How long data from anonymous users is retained (in days).


Method for anonymous contact initiation (random_matching, public_rooms, profile_search, interest_based).


How long user-generated content is retained (in days).


Type of content (text, image, video, document).


Whether anonymous conversations are logged and stored.


Organization coordinating multi-platform investigation.


Links device evidence to related social media account.


Links social media evidence to related device evidence.


Whether anonymity is maintained across connected platforms or services.


Links evidence found on different platforms but from same user.


Whether the platform has Child Sexual Abuse Imagery detection systems enabled.


Links a disclosure action to the specific data that was disclosed.


Type of electronic device (computer, phone, tablet, storage media).


Number of devices searched in simultaneous operation.


Links evidence to the investigative action during which it was discovered.


Timestamp when evidence was discovered by investigators.


Whether the platform can provide emergency disclosures for imminent threats.


Links platform to temporary account systems enabled.


The level of encryption used by the service (e.g., 'none', 'in-transit', 'end-to-end').


Links a content item or moderation-relevant observable object to a moderation queue for review/processing.


Category of evidence (possession, distribution, production, communication).


Timestamp when evidence was created or posted.


Links contact opportunity to random user matching systems.


Volume of flagged items generated per month (e.g., potential CSAM files flagged).


Whether evidence was found on electronic device.


Whether evidence was found on social media platform.


Links platform to identity disclosure policies governing anonymous users.


Whether platform allows guest accounts with minimal verification.


Temporal begin point for platform action.


Temporal end point for platform action.


Links a moderation queue to a backlog situation indicating capacity constraints.


Links a platform to its content moderation capabilities.


Links a platform to its data retention policy.


Links a platform to its legal compliance capabilities.


Temporal begin point for platform phase.


Temporal end point for platform phase.


Temporal begin point for platform operation.


Temporal end point for platform operation.


Links a platform to its user verification system.


Whether the platform uses hash matching against known CSAM databases.


Country or jurisdiction where the organization is headquartered.


Circumstances under which anonymous user identity may be disclosed (never, legal_request, safety_violation, platform_choice).


Whether identity verification is required for account creation.


The legal authority (court, agency) that requested the data disclosure.


Contact information for submitting legal process requests.


Type of legal process used to obtain evidence (warrant, subpoena, court order).


How long access and activity logs are retained (in days).


Links platform to anonymity protection levels maintained.


The decision made during content moderation (e.g., 'approved', 'removed', 'restricted', 'flagged').


The method used for content moderation (e.g., 'automated', 'human review', 'hybrid', 'user reporting').


Level of moderation in anonymous areas (none, minimal, moderate, heavy).


Links platform to anonymous contact opportunities provided.


Links a platform or service to the organization that operates it.


Legal jurisdictions where the platform operates.


Duration of platform phase.


Duration of platform operation from launch to shutdown.


The type or category of the platform (e.g., 'social media', 'messaging', 'file hosting').


Number of platforms investigated in coordinated effort.


How long data is preserved in response to legal requests (in days).


The primary demographic of platform users (e.g., 'adults', 'teens', 'children', 'all ages').


Links anonymous chat platform to specific anonymity features provided.


Links contact opportunity to open chat room access.


Links a moderation queue to the electronic service provider operating the queue.


Number of items currently in a content moderation queue.


Links a moderation queue to operational throughput/latency metrics.


Whether the platform requires user registration to access services.


Typical response time for legal process requests (in days).


Latency from flagging/enqueue to human or automated review completion, expressed in hours.


Whether search warrant was required to obtain this evidence.


Name of social media platform where evidence was found.


Links a platform or organization to its parent company.


Duration of account suspension (in days, or 'permanent').


The reason for account suspension or termination.


Number of items reviewed/processed per day in the moderation pipeline.


How long user account data is retained (in days).


Strength of identity verification (none, email_only, phone_optional, id_required).


Coordination activities between ICAC affiliate organizations for unified prevention efforts.


Coordinated sharing of educational resources and prevention materials among ICAC affiliates.


Education programs targeted to specific age groups.


Knowledge repository system providing access to archived educational publications and historical safety information.


Prevention strategies focused on behavioral changes.


Validation shape for behavioral prevention instances.


Prevention programs focused on reducing bullying and shaming.


National Child Abuse Prevention Month coordinated awareness activities.


Education programs teaching children about safety.


Validation shape for child safety education instances.


Education programs for community members.


Validation shape for community education instances.


Educator working in community prevention programs.


Organized email communication system for ongoing safety updates to parents and community members.


Measurement of community engagement in prevention.


Comprehensive metrics for measuring community engagement across multiple communication channels.


Validation shape for community engagement instances.


Regular newsletter communication system for ongoing community engagement and safety updates.


Outreach programs to engage communities in child protection. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Community Outreach Coordination Validation Shape

Validates that community outreach has coordinators.


Measurement of community outreach program effectiveness in generating victim disclosures and arrests.


Validation shape for community outreach instances.


Initiative building partnerships with community organizations for child protection.


System for tracking participant progress and completion rates in interactive safety courses.


Validates data quality for prevention entities.


Education on digital literacy and safe technology use.


Prevention programs focused on digital safety.


Validation shape for digital safety instances.


Strategies to reduce barriers preventing victim disclosure.


Strategy for encouraging victims to disclose abuse through education and support.


System allowing discreet access to safety information to reduce bullying and shaming.


Integration capabilities between different educational delivery platforms and content management systems.


Online portal providing educational resources for child protection. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Education Portal Resource Validation Shape

Validates that education portals provide educational resources.


Validation shape for education portal instances.


School-based poster distribution campaign for prevention education.


Resource designed for educational purposes in child protection.


Validation shape for educational resource instances.


Training programs specifically designed for educators.


Validation shape for educator training instances.


Metrics tracking email list subscription rates, open rates, and engagement patterns.


Prevention strategies focused on environmental factors.


Validation shape for environmental prevention instances.


Structured question and answer system for Internet Crimes Against Children frequently asked questions.


Metrics tracking FAQ access patterns, most searched questions, and help-seeking behaviors.


Training for healthcare providers on child protection.


Validation shape for healthcare provider training instances.


Network of formally affiliated ICAC organizations for coordinated child protection efforts.


Physical poster containing educational information and QR codes.


Metrics tracking course enrollment, completion rates, and learning effectiveness.


Interactive online safety course platform with progression tracking and engagement features.


Validates language availability for educational resources.


Educational content incorporating multiple media types including audio, video, and interactive elements.


Nationwide coordinated awareness campaign involving multiple agencies and communities.


Education about staying safe online.


Validation shape for online safety education instances.


Investigation initiated as direct result of community outreach presentation.


Specialized email list for parent and community safety updates and archived publication access.


Education programs for parents and caregivers.


Validation shape for parent education instances.


Technology tools for parental oversight.


Validation shape for parental control instances.


Program educating parents on recognizing signs of child exploitation and reporting.


Safety measures implemented by technology platforms.


Validation shape for platform safety instances.


Audio-based educational content delivery system, such as the Protect Kids Online (PKO) Podcast.


Metrics tracking podcast download rates, completion rates, and listener engagement.


Victim disclosure that occurs following a safety presentation or educational event.


Metrics tracking poster distribution and reach.


Advocate promoting prevention initiatives.


Structured curriculum for prevention education.


Validation shape for prevention curriculum instances.


Assessment of prevention program effectiveness.


Validation shape for prevention effectiveness instances.


Prevention Effectiveness Validation Shape

Validates prevention program effectiveness metrics.


Educational material focused on prevention strategies.


Validation shape for prevention material instances.


Metrics for measuring prevention program effectiveness.


Validation shape for prevention metrics instances.


Structured program designed to prevent child abuse and exploitation. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Prevention Program Delivery Validation Shape

Validates that prevention programs have delivery specialists.


Validation shape for prevention program instances.


Professional specializing in prevention programs.


Prevention strategies that stop abuse before it occurs.


Validation shape for primary prevention instances.


Validates program duration consistency.


Campaigns to raise public awareness about child protection. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for public awareness instances.


Metrics tracking QR code usage and engagement.


QR code system for discreet access to prevention information.


Workflow enabling rapid response from victim disclosure to arrest (e.g., 8-hour timeline).


Tool for assessing risks to child safety.


Validation shape for risk assessment tool instances.


Programs focused on preventing risk factors for child abuse. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for risk prevention instances.


Measurement of risk reduction achieved.


Validation shape for risk reduction instances.


Creation of safe environment where victims feel comfortable disclosing abuse.


Coordinator responsible for safety programs.


Guidelines for maintaining child safety.


Validation shape for safety guideline instances.


Protocol designed to ensure child safety in various settings.


Safety Protocol Implementation Validation Shape

Validates that safety protocols are implemented by organizations.


Validation shape for safety protocol instances.


Protocol for managing allegations of abuse in school settings. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for school allegation protocol instances.


Training program for school counselors.


Validation shape for school counselor training instances.


Distribution of educational materials to schools.


Policy governing child protection in schools.


Validation shape for school policy instances.


FBI school presentation program for child safety education and disclosure encouragement.


Safety program implemented in school settings.


Validation shape for school safety program instances.


Early intervention strategies to prevent escalation.


Validation shape for secondary prevention instances.


Prevention program focused on sextortion education and awareness.


Validation shape for sextortion awareness instances.


Educational content specifically addressing sextortion risks and prevention.


Validation shape for sextortion education instances.


Response protocol for sextortion incidents.


Validation shape for sextortion response instances.


Identifiable warning signs of sextortion activities.


Validation shape for sextortion warning sign instances.


Metrics for measuring statewide prevention campaign effectiveness.


Safety education program for students.


Validation shape for student education instances.


Validates target audience appropriateness for child safety education.


Training program specifically for teachers.


Validation shape for teacher training instances.


Validates temporal consistency for prevention activities.


Prevention of re-victimization and recurrence.


Validation shape for tertiary prevention instances.


Education helping children identify trusted adults for disclosure.


Safety education targeted specifically for students 12 years and older.


Safety education event that triggers victim disclosure of ongoing abuse.


Community member accesses archived publication system.


Number of currently active participants in interactive courses.


Education addresses specific sextortion warning signs.


Number of organizations in the ICAC affiliate network.


Organization is formally affiliated with ICAC network.


Target age group for safety education.


Number of arrests resulting from outreach-generated disclosures.


Risk factor assessed by the tool.


Average time in hours from presentation to victim disclosure.


Average time in minutes users spend accessing FAQ information.


Average listening duration in minutes per episode.


Level of community participation (0.0-1.0).


Percentage increase in community reporting following initiative.


Coordinator responsible for outreach program.


Links awareness initiative to coordinating agencies.


Coordination activity involves specific affiliate organization.


Frequency of affiliate coordination meetings and activities.


Course completion rate percentage (0.0-1.0) for interactive safety courses.


Number of interactive modules in the course system.


Specialist delivering the prevention program.


Number of disclosure barriers identified and addressed.


Number of victim disclosures generated by outreach program.


Number of discrete accesses to safety information.


Educational resource is distributed through community email list.


Organization (school) receiving poster distribution.


Topic or subject covered by educational resource.


Number of users reached by education portal.


Number of active subscribers to community email list.


Email open rate percentage (0.0-1.0) for community communications.


QR code enables discreet access to safety information.


Links disclosure to rapid response capability.


Community organization engaged by outreach.


Links vigilance program to parent participants.


Interactive course system is enhanced by multimedia educational content.


Total number of accesses to the FAQ knowledge base.


Number of frequently asked questions in the knowledge base.


Podcast series hosts educational content on platform integration system.


Links program to trusted adult identification.


Status of protocol implementation (planned, active, completed).


Safety protocol implemented by organization.


Poster integrates QR code for information access.


Multimedia content integrates with education platform systems.


Languages in which resource is available.


Organization maintains community email list for ongoing communication.


Engagement metrics measure effectiveness of community communication system.


Usage metrics monitor access patterns of FAQ knowledge base.


Rate of parental engagement in vigilance program (0.0-1.0).


Number of participants in prevention program.


Total number of podcast episode downloads.


Number of episodes in the podcast education series.


Number of posters distributed in campaign.


Number of students attending safety presentation.


Effectiveness score of prevention program (0.0-1.0).


Whether system helps prevent bullying and shaming.


Mechanism or behavior prevented by program.


Duration of prevention program in months.


Educational resource provided by portal.


Number of archived publications available in the system.


Educational resource is published to archive publication system.


Whether campaign uses QR codes for information access.


Number of QR code scans recorded.


Community member queries FAQ knowledge base for information.


Whether rapid response (sub-24 hour) capability is available.


Links strategy to disclosure barrier it addresses.


System reduces shaming associated with seeking help.


Frequency of resource sharing activities (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly).


Links outreach-triggered investigation to arrest.


Level of risk reduction achieved (0.0-1.0).


Number of schools targeted by poster campaign.


Number of warning signs covered in education.


Resource sharing activity involves specific affiliate organization.


Percentage of state covered by campaign (0.0-1.0).


Organization supporting the prevention program.


Age group targeted by poster campaign (e.g., '12+').


Target audience for educational resource.


Target audience for prevention program.


Metrics system tracks engagement data for podcast education series.


Tracking system monitors progress of interactive course participants.


Links outreach activity to victim disclosure it triggered.


Number of trusted adults identified by children in program.


Phase during which production activities are actively occurring.


Validation for active production phase instances.


Specific surveillance of bathroom facilities, as observed in Vermont case.


Specific surveillance of sleeping areas and bedrooms.


Object used to hide recording equipment such as backpacks, furniture, or everyday items with modifications.


Process of creating, editing, or enhancing child sexual abuse material.


Location specifically prepared or modified for production activities.


Validates data quality for production offenses.


Specific methods and techniques used to hide recording devices for covert surveillance operations.


Digital alteration or enhancement of images or videos to create child sexual abuse material.


Original content that has been digitally modified or enhanced.


Computer hardware and software used to edit or enhance produced material.


Validates that production offenses have appropriate equipment.


Validates extended production operation consistency.


Validation shape for extended production operation instances.


Ongoing pattern of production over an extended time period.


Validation shape for facilitator role instances.


Covert recording equipment designed to capture content without victim awareness.


Validation shape for image post-processing instances.


Real-time production of child sexual abuse material involving live victims.


Validation shape for live production event instances.


Content transmitted in real-time during live production events.


Mobile phone, tablet, or portable device used for recording.


Physical alterations made to recording devices to enable concealment.


Validation shape for primary producer instances.


Covert surveillance of private spaces where victims have expectation of privacy.


Child sexual abuse material created through production activities.


Still images created through production activities.


Video content created through production activities.


Individual who creates, directs, or facilitates the production of child sexual abuse material.


Prevents conflicting roles from being assigned simultaneously.


Validation shape for producer role instances.


Validates cross-references between production and related entities.


Phase during which produced content is distributed or shared.


Devices and equipment used to produce child sexual abuse material.


Validation shape for production equipment instances.


gUFO validation for production events ensuring proper temporal modeling.


Individual who assists in or enables production activities without directly producing content.


Physical location where child sexual abuse material production occurred.


Validation shape for production location instances.


Criminal offense involving the production, creation, or manufacturing of child sexual abuse material.


Validation shape for CSAM production offense instances.


gUFO-enhanced validation shape for production phases with anti-rigidity constraints.


Phase involving preparation and setup for production activities.


gUFO-enhanced validation shape for production roles with anti-rigidity and temporal constraints.


Connected series of production sessions targeting the same victim(s).


Individual instance or session of producing child sexual abuse material.


gUFO validation for production situations ensuring proper modeling of ongoing states.


Child victim directly involved in production of sexual abuse material.


Action of recording child sexual abuse for the purpose of creating illegal material.


Device capable of capturing video or photographic content.


Validation shape for recording device instances.


Private residence used for production activities.


Fixed camera equipment including webcams, digital cameras, and video cameras.


Validates temporal consistency in production offenses.


Validation shape for text overlay instances.


Specific location where device was concealed (bathroom, bedroom, living_area).


Specific technique used to hide recording device (fabric_cut, false_bottom, hollow_object).


Whether abuse documentation captured victim's physical development over time.


Brand or manufacturer of recording device.


Model number or name of recording device.


Whether content was produced for distribution (personal_use, intended_distribution, commercial).


Links edited content to editing equipment used.


Links produced content to the production offense it evidences.


Whether physical evidence of production was recovered.


Links production activity to individual who facilitated it.


Forensic value of production evidence (high, medium, low).


Temporal begin point for production phase.


Temporal end point for production phase.


Temporal begin point for production role.


Temporal end point for production role.


Number of images produced during production activities.


Whether content was distributed immediately after production.


Links production activity to victim involved.


Access control at production location (unrestricted, controlled, restricted).


Security measures at production location (isolated, private, public).


Whether original metadata from production was preserved.


Description of physical modifications made to enable concealment.


Links individual session to larger production series.


Level of privacy expectation in surveillance location (high, medium, low).


Links production activity to location where it occurred.


Links production activity to the individual who produced it.


Links production activity to content created.


Complexity level of production (basic, intermediate, sophisticated).


Date when production activities ended.


Method used for production (direct_recording, live_streaming, digital_manipulation).


Duration of production activities in days.


Date when production activities began.


Links produced content to the device used for recording.


Recording capabilities of device (photo_only, video_only, both).


Technical quality of recorded content (low, medium, high, professional).


Links production session to content created during that session.


Number of distinct production sessions.


Duration of individual production session in minutes.


Links production session to its physical location.


Storage capacity of recording device in gigabytes.


Camera angle or positioning for surveillance (pointing_toward_bathroom, wide_angle, focused).


Whether production shows systematic, ongoing pattern rather than isolated incidents.


Total amount of content produced in megabytes.


Links production offense to investigation it triggered.


Links production activity to equipment used.


Age of victim at time of production.


Age range documented showing victim's development (e.g., '13-16').


Whether victim was aware of recording (aware, unaware, coerced).


Number of distinct victims involved in production.


Number of videos produced during production activities.


Academic difficulties creating vulnerability to recruitment offers.


Recruitment occurring after school hours when supervision is reduced.


School attendance issues that may indicate or facilitate trafficking involvement.


Introduction of new victim to trafficker through existing victim who is a classmate.


Recruitment network operating within educational institutions using existing victims to recruit classmates.


Recruitment where existing victims are forced or coerced to recruit their peers.


School or educational facility where recruitment occurs or reporting takes place.


Recruitment occurring during extracurricular activities or school events.


Exploitation of existing friendships and trust relationships between minors for recruitment.


Recruitment occurring during lunch breaks or between classes.


Activation of mandatory reporting requirements by school personnel.


Recruitment leveraging peer pressure and social influence among minors.


Susceptibility to peer pressure enabling recruitment through classmates.


Network of traffickers utilizing existing victims to recruit new victims through peer relationships and social connections.


Incentives offered to existing victims for successful recruitment of new victims.


Punishment threatened or applied to victims who fail to recruit new victims.


System where existing victims must recruit specified number of new victims.


Temporal patterns and timing of recruitment activities within educational environments.


Trafficking recruitment occurring within or through school environments and relationships.


Reporting of trafficking incidents through educational institution personnel.


School counselor who may receive disclosures from trafficking victims.


Recruitment occurring during regular school hours through peer interactions.


Contact made by school personnel to law enforcement regarding trafficking concerns.


Social worker employed by educational institution who receives victim reports.


Employee of educational institution involved in reporting or responding to trafficking.


Factors within educational environment that increase vulnerability to recruitment.


Leveraging existing social connections between victims to facilitate new recruitment.


Student isolation within school environment making them vulnerable to recruitment.


Report made by school social worker to law enforcement regarding trafficking victim.


Exploitation of student social networks and peer relationships for trafficking recruitment.


Teacher who identifies signs of trafficking or receives disclosures from students.


Recruitment of new victims through existing trafficking victims acting as intermediaries.


Disclosure by trafficking victim to school personnel about their situation.


Academic performance level (failing, below_average, average, above_average, excellent).


School attendance rate as percentage (0.0-1.0).


Links student to educational institution they attend.


Average time from introduction to successful recruitment in days.


Links school staff to law enforcement contact they make.


Links school staff member to educational institution where they work.


Links victim to vulnerability factors they exhibit.


Links recruitment to vulnerability factor being exploited.


Links recruitment to victim who facilitated the introduction.


School grade level where recruitment occurs (elementary, middle, high).


Links recruitment network to victim being used as recruiter.


Links classmate introduction to trafficker being introduced to.


Whether report was triggered by mandatory reporting requirements.


Links school intervention to vulnerability factor it addresses.


Number of participants in the recruitment network.


Links trafficking operation to recruitment network it utilizes.


Links school staff member to report they receive from victim.


Total number of recruitment attempts made through network.


Links recruiting victim to new victim they recruit.


Time delay between incident and reporting to authorities in days.


Role of school staff member making the report (social_worker, counselor, teacher, administrator).


Links victim to school where they made disclosure.


Type of educational institution (public, private, charter, alternative).


Number of educational institutions involved in recruitment network.


Socioeconomic level of school community (low, middle, high, mixed).


Total number of students in educational institution.


Number of successful recruitments achieved through network.


Links recruitment network to educational institution being targeted.


Links school-based reporting to investigation it triggers.


Number of existing victims being used as recruiters.


Numerical assessment of vulnerability factors (0.0-1.0).


Validation shape for academic struggles instances.


Validation shape for attendance problems instances.


Validation shape for classmate introduction instances.


Validation shape for classmate recruitment network instances.


Validation shape for coerced peer recruitment instances.


General data quality constraints for recruitment networks module.


Validation shape for educational institution instances.


Educational Reporting Data Quality Shape

Data quality constraints for educational reporting instances.


Validates consistency between network size and victim recruiter count.


Validation shape for peer recruitment network instances.


Validates consistency between recruitment attempts and successes.


Validation shape for recruitment quota instances.


Validation shape for recruitment timing instances.


Validation shape for school-based recruitment instances.


Validation shape for school-based reporting instances.


Validates reasonable reporting timelines for school-based reports.


Validation shape for school social worker instances.


Validation shape for school staff member instances.


Validation shape for school vulnerability factor instances.


Validation shape for social worker report instances.


Validation shape for victim-mediated recruitment instances.


Validation shape for victim school disclosure instances.


Legal process to challenge conviction or sentence in higher court. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Outcome of an appellate issue or appeal (e.g., affirmed, reversed, vacated, remanded). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for appellate dispositions.


Issue raised on appeal to challenge a conviction or sentence (e.g., evidentiary admission, sufficiency of evidence, sentencing reasonableness). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for appellate issues (issue → disposition, optional evidence-rule and standard-of-review links).


Initial court appearance where charges are formally read and plea is entered. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Charge for intentionally accessing and viewing child sexual abuse material. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for causing or facilitating the production of child sexual abuse material, distinct from direct production. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for distribution of child sexual abuse material. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for possession of child sexual abuse material. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for production of child sexual abuse material, typically carrying severe mandatory minimum sentences. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for receiving child sexual abuse material on cellular phone or mobile device. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Use of carriage service to cause child abuse material to be transmitted to self, contrary to section 474.22(1)(a)(ii) Criminal Code (Cth). Maximum penalty 15 years imprisonment. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Use of carriage service to transmit indecent communication to person under 16 years, contrary to section 474.27A Criminal Code (Cth). Maximum penalty 10 years imprisonment. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Child abuse offense under Commonwealth law subject to mandatory minimum sentencing provisions. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Sentence requiring unpaid work for community benefit. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Using Computer to Seduce Solicit or Lure Child

Florida state charge for using a computer to seduce, solicit, or lure a child to engage in sexual conduct. Covers electronic communication with minors for sexual purposes. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for F.S. 847.0135(3) computer solicitation charges.


Contributing to Delinquency or Dependency of Child

Florida state charge for contributing to the delinquency or dependency of a child. Applies when adult actions contribute to a child becoming delinquent or dependent. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for F.S. 827.04 contributing to delinquency charges.


Validation shape for conviction record instances.


Formal accusation of criminal activity in ICAC cases. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for criminal fine instances.


Punishment imposed by court for criminal conviction. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Criminal Sentence Concurrency Business Rule

Business rule: a sentence MUST NOT be declared concurrent with itself.


Validation shape for criminal sentences, including concurrency semantics for concurrent jail/probation terms (as in the Utah Christensen 2021 sentences).


Validates data quality for sentencing outcomes.


Role of individual charged with ICAC crimes. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Role of defense attorney representing ICAC defendants. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Direct Promotion of Sexual Performance by a Child

Florida state charge for direct promotion of a sexual performance by a child. Applies when defendant promotes, directs, or produces sexual conduct involving a minor. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Direct Promotion of Sexual Performance Shape

Validation shape for F.S. 827.071(4) promoting sexual performance by a child charges.


Validation shape for enhancement factor instances.


A rule of evidence cited in an appellate issue or opinion (e.g., Federal Rule of Evidence 403, 404(b), 414). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for evidence rules cited in appellate issues.


Appellate issue concerning a trial court evidentiary ruling, including admission/exclusion decisions and related prejudice analysis (e.g., under Federal Rules of Evidence). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Criminal charge under federal law and jurisdiction. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for felony charge instances.


Criminal charge under Florida state law and jurisdiction for ICAC-related offenses. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for Florida state charge instances in ICAC cases.


Criminal charge under Georgia state law and jurisdiction for CAC-related offenses. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for Georgia state charge instances in CAC cases.


Validation shape for imprisonment sentence instances.


Role of judge presiding over ICAC legal proceedings. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Broader situation involving judicial system processing of ICAC cases. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


Role of jury members in ICAC trial proceedings. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Complex situation encompassing the entire legal case from charges to resolution. Modeled as gUFO Situation.


Validation shape for legal charge instances.


Formal judicial process for prosecuting cacontology-related crimes. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for legal proceeding instances, including pretrial bail status (e.g., held without bail in the Utah Christensen case).


Prison sentence of life imprisonment (typically without a fixed term duration). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Offense involving live streaming of child abuse, often carrying severe sentences. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Sentencing under mandatory minimum provisions for Commonwealth child sexual abuse offenses. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Financial penalty including fines, restitution, or forfeiture. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for online enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validates payment deadline consistency.


Negotiation process between prosecution and defense for plea agreement. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Phase after conviction including appeals and compliance. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Phase before trial including arraignment and plea bargaining. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Sentence involving incarceration in federal or state prison. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Role of probation officer supervising ICAC offenders. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Supervised release with conditions instead of or after incarceration. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for probation sentence instances.


Professional License Surrender Condition

Condition associated with a plea agreement or sentencing outcome requiring the defendant to surrender a professional license (e.g., a nursing license).


Professional License Surrender Condition Shape

Validation shape for conditions requiring surrender of a professional license.


Role of prosecutor handling ICAC criminal charges. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Validation shape for restitution order instances.


Validates restitution order consistency.


Validates sentence duration consistency.


Validates cross-references between sentencing and related entities.


Validation shape for sentencing guidelines instances.


Court proceeding where sentence is determined and imposed. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Validation shape for sentencing outcome instances.


Phase focused on sentencing determination and imposition. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Appellate issue challenging the procedural and/or substantive reasonableness of a sentence (e.g., under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Charge for sex trafficking of minors. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Criminal charge specifically related to sextortion involving sexual extortion of children through online blackmail. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Georgia state charge for sexual exploitation of a minor, as reported in a Georgia Attorney General press release. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Sexual Exploitation of a Minor (GA) Charge Shape

Validation shape for Georgia sexual exploitation of a minor charge instances.


Offense of soliciting sexually explicit material from children (e.g., from 10 foreign children via social media). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Appellate standard of review applied to an appellate issue (e.g., de novo, abuse of discretion, plain error). Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validation shape for standards of review.


Criminal charge under state law and jurisdiction. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Appellate issue challenging whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction under the applicable legal standard. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Period of supervision following completion of prison sentence. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Validates temporal consistency in conviction records.


Trafficking of Persons for Sexual Servitude (GA)

Georgia state charge for trafficking of persons for sexual servitude, as reported in a Georgia Attorney General press release. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Trafficking of Persons for Sexual Servitude (GA) Charge Shape

Validation shape for Georgia trafficking-for-sexual-servitude charge instances.


Florida state charge for traveling to meet after using a computer to lure a child. Applies when defendant uses electronic communication to lure a child and then travels to meet them. Modeled as gUFO Object.


Traveling To Meet After Computer Lure Shape

Validation shape for F.S. 847.0135(4) traveling to meet a minor after computer lure charges.


Validation shape for treatment order instances.


Active trial phase with proceedings and evidence presentation. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Phase.


Formal trial process with jury or judge determining guilt or innocence. Modeled as gUFO Event.


Role of victim in ICAC legal proceedings. Modeled as anti-rigid gUFO Role.


Links an appellate issue to the standard of review applied by the appellate court.


Links criminal sentence to the charge it addresses.


Status of the defendant's pretrial release for a legal proceeding (e.g., released_on_bail, held_without_bail, released_on_own_recognizance).


Florida charge classification (capital_felony, life_felony, first_degree_felony, etc.).


Links an appellate issue to an evidence rule cited or applied in the issue analysis.


Platform used for electronic communication in the offense.


Links one criminal sentence to another sentence that is ordered to run concurrently.


Links a plea/sentencing condition to the person it applies to (typically the defendant).


Type of contribution in delinquency charges (delinquency, dependency, both).


The current active phase of the legal proceeding.


Categorical appellate disposition identifier (e.g., affirmed, reversed, vacated, remanded).


Indicates whether electronic communication was used in the offense.


Reference to Florida Statute section for the charge (e.g., 'F.S. 847.0135').


Links legal proceeding to criminal charges involved.


Links legal proceeding to its phases.


Temporal begin point for legal phase.


Temporal end point for legal phase.


Temporal begin point for legal proceeding.


Temporal end point for legal proceeding.


Links individual to their role in legal proceeding.


Temporal begin point for legal role.


Temporal end point for legal role.


Temporal begin point for sentence implementation.


Temporal end point for sentence completion.


Number of charges involved in legal situation.


Number of participants involved in legal situation.


Links an appellate issue to its disposition.


Links role to legal proceeding participated in.


Duration of legal phase.


Duration of legal proceeding from start to completion.


Type of promotion in sexual performance charges (direct_promotion, directing, producing, facilitating).


Links an appeal process to an appellate issue raised for review.


Links a professional license surrender condition to the professional license that must be surrendered.


Links legal proceeding to resulting criminal sentence.


Duration of individual's legal role.


Citation string for an evidence rule (e.g., 'Fed. R. Evid. 403').


Indicates whether a criminal sentence is concurrent, consecutive, or mixed with respect to other sentences (values: concurrent, consecutive, mixed).


Duration of criminal sentence.


Complexity level of legal situation (1-5 scale).


Type of solicitation in computer solicitation charges (seduce, solicit, lure, entice, multiple).


Categorical standard-of-review identifier (e.g., de_novo, abuse_of_discretion, plain_error).


Links one legal phase to the next phase in sequence.


Indicates whether actual travel occurred in traveling to meet charges.


Historical record of registered addresses.


Address Verification Cross Reference Shape

Validates that registered offenders have current address information.


Exploitation where offender explicitly acknowledges victim's minor status but continues criminal activity.


Validates age-related constraints for registered offenders.


Known alias or alternate name used by registered sex offender.


Annual review and update of sex offender registration information.


Exchange where offender both sends explicit content to victim and solicits/receives explicit content from victim.


Notification to community about registered sex offender.


Arrest coordinated with scheduled compliance activity such as annual registration review.


History of compliance with registration requirements.


Coordination between law enforcement investigations and compliance schedules for arrest timing.


Violation of sex offender registration requirements.


Validation shape for compliance violation instances.


Restriction on contact with certain individuals or groups.


Criminal offense that resulted in sex offender registration requirement.


Validation shape for convicting offense instances.


Court order mandating sex offender registration.


Investigation involving registered sex offender targeting victims across state boundaries using digital platforms.


Pattern of recidivism involving offenses across state boundaries.


Validates data quality for registry entities.


Pattern of repeat sexual offenses using digital communication platforms.


Educational enrollment information for registered sex offender.


Validation shape for education information instances.


Current employment information for registered sex offender.


Validation shape for employment information instances.


Restriction on types of employment.


Criminal offense for failing to register or update required information in a sex offender registry. Typically serves as a registry-triggering or enhancing offense for compliance analytics.


Criminal offense for knowingly providing false or misleading information in connection with sex offender registration (e.g., false address, contact information, or online identifiers).


Geographic area where offender is restricted from being.


Digital exploitation involving thousands of messages or communications over extended period.


Distinctive physical mark (scar, tattoo, birthmark) for identification.


Internet-related information for registered sex offender.


Restriction on internet use or online activities.


Internet service provider used by registered sex offender.


Digital evidence containing multiple content types (text, images, audio, video) in single exploitation case.


Classification tier determining level of community notification required.


Search warrant executed on registered sex offender's residence and devices for digital evidence recovery.


Comprehensive profile of registered sex offender including all required information.


Validation shape for offender profile instances.


Offender Registration Cross Reference Shape

Validates that registered offenders have required registration records.


Classification of sexual offense (felony/misdemeanor, degree, special categories).


Online username, email, or identifier used by registered sex offender.


Collection of identifiers for registered sex offender (SSN, DOB, aliases, etc.).


Official photograph of registered sex offender.


Physical description of registered sex offender (height, weight, scars, tattoos).


Validation shape for physical description instances.


Primary residential address where offender lives.


Validation shape for primary residence instances.


Professional license held by registered sex offender.


Public website for searching sex offender registry information.


Recidivism Post-Registration Business Rule

Business rule: a recidivist sex offender SHOULD have at least one postRegistrationEvent linked to post-registration abuse/CSAM incidents.


Registered sex offender who has committed subsequent sexual offenses after initial conviction and registration.


Validation shape for recidivist sex offenders, ensuring post-registration offending events can be linked for analytics (e.g., Utah Christensen Garfield County CSAM case).


Official registered address of sex offender.


Validation shape for registered address instances.


Individual required to register as a sex offender.


Validation shape for registered sex offender instances.


Vehicle registered to sex offender.


Alert generated by registry system (non-compliance, address change, etc.).


Validates that registration dates are logical and consistent.


Validates registration frequency requirements based on tier.


Registration Offense Cross Reference Shape

Validates that registration records are based on convicting offenses.


Official record of sex offender registration including all required data elements.


Validation shape for registration record instances.


Specific requirement for sex offender registration (location, frequency, restrictions).


Restriction placed on registered sex offender.


Arrest executed when offender arrives for scheduled registration review or update.


Current status of sex offender registration (active, inactive, non-compliant, etc.).


Validation shape for registration status instances.


Update to sex offender registration information.


Law enforcement agency responsible for maintaining sex offender registry.


Officer responsible for sex offender registration management.


Information system used to manage sex offender registry.


Educational institution where offender is enrolled.


Registry system maintaining information about registered sex offenders.


Validation shape for sex offender registry instances.


Social media account belonging to registered sex offender.


Validates temporal consistency for registry actions and records.


Temporary address where offender will be residing.


Information about vehicles owned or operated by registered sex offender.


Validation shape for vehicle information instances.


Official verification of sex offender registration information.


Validation shape for verification check instances.


Forensic examination of victim's device to recover evidence of digital exploitation.


Information about victims relevant to registration (age, relationship, count).


Validation shape for victim information instances.


Location where registered sex offender is employed.


Validation shape for work location instances.


Method by which offender acknowledged victim's age (verbal, written, direct_question).


Timing of arrest in relation to compliance activity (arrival, during, departure).


Educational institution where offender is enrolled.


Criminal offense that triggered registration requirement.


Type of compliance activity used for arrest coordination (annual_review, quarterly_check, address_update).


Types of explicit content solicited and received from victim.